If even light drinking can cause cancer, why don’t doctors warn their patients about it?
As I discuss in my video Can Alcohol Cause Cancer?, we’ve known about “the possible association of the consumption of alcohol with excessive mortality from cancer” for more than a hundred years. Though there is “accumulating evidence that alcohol drinking is associated with…pancreas and prostate cancer and melanoma,” we’re pretty certain it “increases the risk of cancer of oral cavity [mouth] and pharynx [throat], oesophagus, colorectum, liver, larynx [voice box] and female breast.” Current estimates suggest alcohol causes about 5.8 percent of all cancer deaths in these organs worldwide.
How does it break down for men and women? As you can see at 0:44 in my video, alcohol causes mostly head, neck, and gastrointestinal cancers in men, whereas it causes mostly breast cancer in women. In fact, alcohol appears to cause more than 100,000 cases of breast cancer every year. Is that just among heavy drinkers, though? No. “All levels of evidence showed a risk relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer, even at low levels of consumption.”
Eating a healthy diet, however, may help modulate that risk. Though alcohol increases the risk of breast cancer, “a fiber-rich diet has the opposite effect,” so eating more whole plant foods may be able to “ease the adverse effects associated with alcohol consumption.” As well, “alcohol has been shown to increase sex hormone levels,” like estrogen, which may increase breast cancer risk, but the opposite effect is seen when eating fiber-rich foods. “Fiber may bind estrogen in the colon thus increasing the fecal excretion of estrogens”—that is, help flush them out of the body. Even so, there does not appear to be any level of alcohol consumption that is completely safe from a cancer standpoint.
This is why we see commentaries in the medical literature suggesting “consumption of alcohol, an addictive carcinogen, cannot be considered a healthy lifestyle choice!” “Thus, the final message on [alcohol] should be clear: It is toxic, carcinogenic, teratogenic [birth defect–causing], and potentially addictive. By arguing otherwise, scientists can give the alcohol lobby and advertisers the opportunity to manipulate scientific evidence to generate profits” over public health.
They do this by denying and distorting the evidence, while trying to distract the public’s attention. The alcohol industry, Big Booze, “appears to be engaged in the extensive misrepresentation of evidence about the alcohol-related risk of cancer,” activities that “have parallels with those of the tobacco industry,” Big Tobacco. These industries are somehow able to maintain an illusion of righteousness. “Alcohol and tobacco companies (like their junk food counterparts) increasingly seek to present themselves…as objective providers of health information about their products, and appropriate sources of educational resources for both adults and children…Health information and messages should come from health authorities, not the 21st century’s most successful drug peddlers.”
“Alcohol industries profit hugely from this disconnect and sometimes even appropriate the respectable cause of cancer prevention in order to promote their carcinogenic product. Case in point: Mike’s Hard Pink Lemonade. “Join the Fight” and “Drink Pink” are emblazoned on the six-pack, along with the pink breast cancer ribbon icon. More like “drink pink carcinogens!” “Mike’s Hard Lemonade (Mark Anthony Group) associated the creation of its Limited Edition Hard Pink Lemonade with the death of one of its employees from breast cancer.” In doing so, “ironically, it contributes to risk in the name of prevention.” Reminds me of KFC’s “Buckets for the Cure” campaign. If you don’t remember it, see for yourself at 3:21 in my video.
Cancer risk is one of the “things the alcohol industry won’t tell you,” but why doesn’t your doctor tell you? There is relatively little public awareness of the link, and the medical community remains largely silent. The medical profession may be getting more hip to corporate conflicts of interest in general, but “why are we ignoring the alcohol industry?”
“Why is alcohol cancer’s best-kept secret?” Maybe it’s because the doctors are drinkers themselves and want to remain in “denial…that alcohol causes cancer.”
Not only do most doctors drink, but a significant proportion admits to drinking while on call and encountering fellow physicians “whom they suspected were impaired by alcohol while on call.” Even though most doctors felt they “have an obligation to tell their patients that they use alcohol while on call, only 12% reported that they do so when using alcohol on call.”
The industry “has identified the alcohol-causes-cancer message as a considerable threat. These powerful entities have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo of relative ignorance, uncertainty and denial among the general population and their trusted health advisers. In the face of this, it is time that health professionals set aside any leanings that might stem from their own drinking—good or bad—and convey unreservedly to their patients and the communities they serve that alcohol-causes-cancer.”
Cancer is only our second highest killer. The top killer is heart disease, so what about the French paradox? Doesn’t moderate drinking protect against cardiovascular disease? In that case, isn’t some alcohol beneficial overall? These are exactly the kinds of questions I set out to address in this four-part video series, which also includes.
Alcohol consumption has been associated with excessive mortality from cancer for more than a century and causes mostly head, neck, and gastrointestinal cancers in men and breast cancer in women, even at low levels of intake.
Breast cancer risk is increased by alcohol consumption, which also elevates levels of sex hormones, such as estrogen, but fiber-rich diets have the opposite effect, so greater intake of whole plant foods may “ease the adverse effects associated with alcohol consumption.”
Within the medical literature, commentaries condemn alcohol as “toxic, carcinogenic, teratogenic [birth defect–causing], and potentially addictive,” while the alcohol industry has been accused of engaging in “extensive misrepresentation of evidence about the alcohol-related risk of cancer” and participating in activities that “have parallels with those of the tobacco industry.”
Big Booze has even appropriated cancer prevention causes in its marketing—e.g., Mike’s Hard Pink Lemonade with “Join the Fight” and “Drink Pink” emblazoned on the six-pack, along with the pink breast cancer ribbon icon.
The medical community has remained relatively quiet on the link between alcohol consumption and increased cancer risk, perhaps in part because most doctors drink themselves and a significant proportion admits to imbibing while on call.
Michael Greger, M.D.
PS: If you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my free videos here and watch my live presentations:
2013: More Than an Apple a Day